In OpenMx, as model complexity grows, the higher the chance of not setting starting values that will help the optimizer reach a solution. This is particularly true for longitudinal models. This post aims at defining a set of rules that can help you define good starting points and also present what is current available. Starting values can lead to time-consuming, annoying errors and thinking about them during model
| <?xml version="1.0"?> | |
| <labwc_config> | |
| <core> | |
| <gap>5</gap> | |
| </core> | |
| <theme> | |
| <name>OpenboxSur-Dark</name> | |
| <cornerRadius>8</cornerRadius> | |
| <font name="sans" size="10"/> |
| #!/usr/bin/env bash | |
| # lsfz: LocalSearch + fzf with compact labels and Enter-to-open | |
| # Deps: localsearch, fzf, gio (or xdg-open), bash | |
| set -euo pipefail | |
| # How many results to fetch | |
| LIMIT="${LIMIT:-200}" | |
| # What to search (e.g. --files | --documents | --images) |
| # npsol.nim | |
| # Compile & run: | |
| # nim c -r -d:release -d:opencl -d:blas=openblas --mm:refc npsol.nim | |
| import std/[math, strformat, sequtils, os] | |
| import arraymancer | |
| import arraymancer/tensor/tensor_opencl | |
| import arraymancer/tensor/backend/opencl_backend | |
| import numericalnim | |
| import opencl | |
| import datamancer |
| library(purrr) | |
| library(dplyr) | |
| library(future) | |
| library(progress) | |
| # Set up parallel processing | |
| plan(multicore, workers = 23) | |
| # Define the parameters | |
| params <- list( |
| #+OPTIONS: org-html-head-include-default-style:nil | |
| #+OPTIONS: num:nil | |
| #+OPTIONS: html-style:nil | |
| #+OPTIONS: html-scripts:nil | |
| #+OPTIONS: html-postamble:nil | |
| #+OPTIONS: broken-links:mark | |
| #+HTML_HEAD: <style type="text/css"> | |
| #+HTML_HEAD: @charset "utf-8"; | |
| #+HTML_HEAD: @import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:300,400,500'); | |
| #+HTML_HEAD: @import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto Slab:300,400,500'); |
| html,button,input,select,textarea { color: #484C66;}html { font-size: 90%; line-height: 1.4;}*,*:before,*:after { -moz-box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-box-sizing: border-box; box-sizing: border-box;}a { white-space: pre; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: pre-line; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -hp-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word; text-decoration: none;}a:hover { color: #0A4C89;}/* * Remove text-shadow in selection highlight: h5bp.com/i * These selection rule sets have to be separate. * Customize the background color to match your design. */::-moz-selection { background: #0A4C89; color: #FFF; text-shadow: none;}::selection { background: #0A4C89; color: #FFF; text-shadow: none;}/* * A better looking default horizontal rule */hr { display: block; height: 1px; border: 0; border-top: 1px dashed #CCC; margin: 1em 0; padding: 0;}/* * Remove the gap between images, videos, audio and canvas and the bottom of * their containers: |
The ggplot2 plus syntax is a much better fit for what I was attempting. For model building, summing models makes more sense than piping them. And also, the code needed to implement this is much shorter. So for something like:
mb <- mxModel("bivariate Heterogeneity Path Specification",
type = "RAM",
manifestVars = c('X','Y')) +
mxPath( from=c('X','Y'), arrows=2, free=T, values=1, lbound=.01 ) +TLDR: Create OpenMx models using pipes.
Pipes (|) were introduced in bash in order to facilitate I/O redirection. Together with the UNIX tools, manipulation of data becomes very simple and short to write. In R the concept of the pipe came much more recently, with the magrittr package within the context of dplyr and tidy tools manifesto. One fundamental decision was to name the dplyr tools so that they can be read as verbs, which helps with memorizing what each tool does, in contrast to the less obvious naming of the UNIX tools.